Proud to be Vulnerable free
Security and Product Integrity
Chipkin places a strong emphasis on security and product integrity throughout the entire product lifecycle, from initial design and development through deployment and long-term field operation. Our engineering approach prioritizes reliability, predictability, and responsible implementation of industrial and building automation protocols.
Prior to release, products undergo verification and validation processes intended to identify functional issues, configuration risks, and interoperability concerns. These processes include internal testing, regression checks, and review of protocol behavior under expected operating conditions. Where applicable, products are tested against industry standards and commonly deployed third-party systems.
Security is not treated as a one-time milestone but as an ongoing responsibility. As protocols, operating systems, and network environments evolve, new risks can emerge. Chipkin continuously monitors relevant industry publications, vulnerability disclosures, and protocol advisories to assess whether any newly identified issues could affect our products or supported configurations.
In industrial and building automation environments, security must be balanced with availability, maintainability, and operational continuity. Many systems are expected to operate for years or decades, often in constrained or legacy environments. Our goal is to design products that can be deployed responsibly within these realities while providing guidance on best practices for secure operation.
While no vendor can guarantee absolute security under all circumstances, Chipkin aims to reduce risk through sound engineering practices, clear documentation, and practical recommendations. Where updates or mitigations are appropriate, we work to provide customers with accurate information so they can make informed decisions for their specific deployment.
Security Searches and Advisories
Customers and system integrators may consult public vulnerability databases, search engines, or industry forums when researching product advisories or cybersecurity-related topics. The results of these searches can vary significantly depending on terminology, historical brand names, and the scope of the query.
In some cases, automation products are referenced using legacy identifiers, prior corporate names, or platform-level branding rather than the current product name. This can lead to incomplete or misleading search results if only a single identifier is used.
When researching Chipkin-related products, it may be helpful to include both current and historical identifiers in your search terms. These may include QuickServer, Chipkin Automation, Sierra Monitor Corp, and MSA Safety, depending on the product generation and deployment timeframe.
Public vulnerability listings do not always reflect product context, configuration, or real-world usage. An advisory may apply only under specific conditions, such as exposed network interfaces, unsupported firmware versions, or atypical configurations. For this reason, generic search results should not be interpreted as definitive assessments of risk without further technical review.
If you have questions regarding product security, firmware versions, deployment practices, or how a particular advisory may relate to your installation, we recommend contacting Chipkin directly. When doing so, please include the product model, firmware version, and a brief description of the operating environment to help us provide an accurate and relevant response.
